Excelente estudio sobre accidentes (en inglés)
Siganos en...
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook Watch us on YouTube
Registrarse
Resultados 1 al 10 de 10
Like Tree19Gusta
  • 1 Post By mauris
  • 3 Post By 00CHARLIE
  • 5 Post By aleib
  • 1 Post By 00CHARLIE
  • 5 Post By aleib
  • 1 Post By spawn
  • 2 Post By aleib
  • 1 Post By Guarf

Tema: Excelente estudio sobre accidentes (en inglés)

   
  1. #1
    Avatar de mauris
    Fecha de ingreso
    27 may, 10
    Ubicación
    Montevideo, UY
    Edad
    27
    Mensajes
    756
    País
    Italy
    Moto
    Aprilia AF1 125 Futura
    Fotos
    30

    Predeterminado Excelente estudio sobre accidentes (en inglés)

    Case-control study of motorcycle crashes

    Federal Office of Road Safety - Contract Report CR174

    Authors: N. Haworth, R. Smith, I. Brumen & N. Pronk

    Abstract:

    This report presents the findings of the Case-control study of motorcycle crashes. The cases comprised 222 motorcycle crashes occurring on public roads in the Melbourne metropolitan area from late November 1995 to 30 January 1997 in which the rider or pillion was taken to one of the participating hospitals or died. The controls were 1195 motorcyclist trips which passed the crash site at the same time of day and day of week as the crash occurred.

    The study collected three types of information:

    detailed descriptive information about the crash and the resultant injuries
    comparison of features of cases and controls, and
    motorcycle exposure information (gathered as part of collection of control data).

    Executive Summary

    This report presents the findings of the Case-control study of motorcycle crashes. The cases were 222 motorcycle crashes occurring on public roads in the Melbourne metropolitan area from late November 1995 to 30 January 1997 in which the rider or pillion was taken to one of the participating hospitals or died. The controls were 1195 motorcyclist trips which passed the crash site at the same time of day and day of week as the crash occurred.

    The study collected three types of information:

    detailed descriptive information about the crash and the resultant injuries
    comparison of features of cases and controls, and
    motorcycle exposure information (gathered as part of collection of control data).

    CHARACTERISTICS OF CASES

    Of the 222 crashes, 22 involved pillions. Twenty-two riders and three pillions were killed in the crashes, which had the following characteristics:

    most commonly occurred on Fridays
    generally highest frequencies from noon to 8 pm
    almost 20% occurred near the centre of Melbourne
    80% in urban areas
    almost half were on major arterials
    65% occurred in 60 km/h zones
    more than two-thirds on curves
    equally divided between intersection and non-intersection locations
    mostly on two-way undivided roads
    very few local area traffic management devices at crash sites
    the road was not clean at almost one-quarter of the sites and there was deformed pavement or a sudden change in road surface at many sites
    about half occurred on two-lane roads
    poles, kerbs and trees were present at most sites
    there was no evidence of braking at 85% of sites
    9% occurred when it was raining
    about one-quarter occurred under difficult lighting conditions (glare, dusk or dawn, night-time)
    sun glare could have reduced visibility at 13% of sites
    glare from oncoming headlights was a potential problem at 8% of sites

    Type of crash

    one-third were single vehicle crashes
    two-thirds of all crashes involved impact with an object or vehicle, in half of all crashes this was a moving car
    single vehicle crashes were more likely than multi-vehicle crashes to involve alcohol, to occur at night and to involve excessive speed
    23% of crashes were judged to have involved excessive speed for the conditions
    the rider was judged to have contributed to about two-thirds of the multi-vehicle crashes, mainly by inappropriate positioning or failure to respond
    most riders did not consider themselves to be at fault in multi-vehicle crashes to which failure to respond was judged to contribute

    Motorcycles

    167 motorcycles were inspected
    15% had travelled less than 5,000 kms
    more than 20% were judged to be not well cared for (dirt and mud etc)
    about 15% were judged to have been in a poor to fair mechanical condition (compression, bearings etc.) prior to the crash
    clean motorcycles were mostly in good or excellent mechanical condition, whereas most of the motorcycles in poor mechanical condition were dirty
    about a quarter had under-inflated front or rear tyres
    a quarter had a worn or loose chain
    15% had brakes in a poor condition, typically insufficient pad thickness
    19% of rear tyres and 7% of front tyres were badly worn or bald

    Helmets

    145 helmets worn by riders and pillions were inspected
    over 50% were black or "dark"
    20% of visors were tinted
    the average age was four years, with 16% more than 5 years old and so may no longer have been performing optimally
    more than 80% had obvious signs of damage, mostly scratches but some fractures
    in 43% the interior padding was visibly worn or compressed

    INJURIES TO MOTORCYCLISTS IN NON-FATAL CRASHES

    the median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was greater for admitted motorcyclists than presentations (10 versus 5)
    4% of all injured motorcyclists had severe head injuries
    3 of the 5 motorcyclists not wearing helmets sustained head injuries
    facial injuries were uncommon and not significantly more common among those wearing open face helmets than full face helmets (8% versus 4%)
    chest injuries were uncommon but relatively severe when they occurred
    44% of motorcyclists had upper limb injuries and 57% had lower limb injuries
    most common injuries overall were fracture of the knee or lower leg (28%) and fracture of the forearm (17%)
    external injuries (abrasions, contusions or lacerations) occurred to 88% of motorcyclists but were generally not severe
    there was no indication of differences in injury severity for riders and pillions in the same, non-fatal crashes
    single and multi-vehicle crashes did not differ in their injury severity
    injury severity and patterns of injury did not vary significantly as a function of speed zone
    wearing appropriate clothing did not significantly decrease the likelihood or severity of external injuries

    CASE-CONTROL COMPARISONS

    Where odds ratios are cited in this section, they are statistically significant.

    Rider factors

    The factors which were associated with significantly increased crash risk after adjustment for potential confounding factors were:

    age under 25 (compared with age 35 or over)
    never married
    unlicensed
    experienced off-road rider before gaining on-road licence
    having fewer years of on-road riding experience (after adjustment for BAC)
    ride less than 3 days per week - this may be an artefact of the study design
    having completed a beginner course compared with an advanced course
    BAC>.05 (odds ratio of 38) - 13% of crashed riders for whom BAC was known had BAC>.05 compared with less than 1% of control riders
    BAC>.00 (odds ratio of 5)
    consumed alcohol in the previous 12 hours (odds ratio of 2)
    not wearing a helmet (2% of crashed riders and 1% of controls)

    Other results included:

    6% of crashed riders and 3% of control riders had used illicit drugs (mainly marijuana) in the previous 12 hours but the unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios were not statistically significant
    11% of crashed riders and 8% of control riders had taken prescription drugs in the previous 12 hours but none of the odds ratios were statistically significant
    2% of crashed riders and 3% of control riders had taken non-prescription drugs in the previous 12 hours but the numbers were too small to analyse
    after adjustment for BAC, there was no significant increase in risk associated with wearing an open face helmet compared to a full face helmet
    no significant increase in risk associated with wearing a helmet 5 to 10 years old or over 10 years old (compared with one less than 5 years old)
    no significant increase in risk associated with wearing a helmet that did not belong to the rider after adjustment for age and BAC
    none of the odds ratios associated with wearing protective gear were significantly different from one. However, these analyses were based on self-report data for cases and observation for controls and so may have been affected by a social desirability bias for cases.

    Pillion factors

    The presence of pillions could possibly contribute to either crash causation (e.g. by distracting the rider or by producing a higher centre of gravity) or increased crash severity (because they are another person who may be killed or injured).

    pillions were present in 10% of crashes and 7% of controls
    significant increase in crash risk associated with pillion carriage
    70% of pillions in crashes were female, 57% of control pillions

    Motorcycle factors

    The factors which were found to significantly increase crash risk after adjustment for potential confounding factors were:

    riding a motorcycle with engine capacity of 750 cc and above compared to one of 260 cc or below (adjusted for licence status)
    the rider not being the owner of the motorcycle

    Other results included:

    5% of crashed motorcycles and 1% of control motorcycles were unregistered
    most motorcycles were manufactured in 1990 or later and so age of the motorcycle varied little between cases and controls
    two-stroke race replicas comprised 24% of the crashed 250 cc motorcycles compared with 9% of the control 250 cc motorcycles. The increased risk associated with riding these bikes was not significant after adjusting for the effect of alcohol but the adjusted odds ratio was still relatively high (2.7)
    headlights were on for most of the crashed and control motorcycles (both pre- and post-1992) - the odds ratios associated with pre-1992 motorcycles having headlights off were not statistically significant

    Trip factors

    a significant increase in risk was associated with non-work-related trips compared with work-related trips
    no significant increase in risk was associated with the rider being unfamiliar with the road
    the percentage of riders who estimated that they were travelling at above the speed limit was less at higher speed limits
    riders with BAC>.000 were more than twice as likely to state that they were travelling over the speed limit

    The risk factors for which the contribution to crashes was greatest were:

    rider aged under 25
    BAC>.05
    BAC>.00
    unlicensed or unregistered or not ridden by the owner
    non-work-related riding

    EXPOSURE INFORMATION

    Exposure estimates were calculated based on observations of 1121 motorcycles during 325 hours of sampling at or near the crash sites. The overall proportion of the traffic comprised by motorcycles was very low, about 0.5%.

    The highest average number of motorcycles per hour was found on primary arterials (4.05), with the smallest number being found on collector roads (1.23). The proportion of the traffic which is motorcycles appears to be similar across road types.

    Average motorcycles per hour was greatest during weekday and weekend days and the proportion of traffic that were motorcycles was highest on weekend days. Both the average number of motorcycles per hour and the proportion of traffic which were motorcycles were lower at night than during the day.

    The mean number of motorcycles per hour accounted for 79% of the variance in the number of crashes (per time period or per road type). The regression equation describing the relationship is:

    Number of crashes=6.50 x mean number of motorcycles per hour

    The median distance travelled per week was between 201 and 300 kilometres. Riders holding probationary and full licences rode further per week, on average, than holders of learner permits. Engine capacity per se showed little effect on distance ridden.

    RIDING STYLES AND STRATEGIES

    While there were some differences identified, in general, the riding styles and strategies adopted were similar across rider age groups, experience, licence status and training history. The observed differences are summarised below. The greater likelihood that younger riders, many of whom were not fully licensed, had completed at least one training course complicated the interpretation of the observed differences somewhat.

    Summary of observed differences in riding styles and strategies:

    observational skills - frequency of looking behind over one shoulder decreased with age group, more common with training

    approaching intersection - inexperienced riders more likely to decrease speed, trained riders more likely to change position to improve visibility

    position on roadway - younger riders and riders with training less likely to travel in the left-hand wheel track and more likely to travel in the right-hand wheel track (safer)

    following distance - longer gap for inexperienced riders, shorter gap for 25 to 34 year old riders

    response to tailgating - learner and probationary riders and riders with training less likely to speed up

    using the horn - more by experienced riders

    dealing with emergency situations - more near misses usually experienced per month by experienced riders (who ride more), youngest age group report most usual number of near misses per month, inexperienced and trained riders more likely to have practised emergency braking and/or counter-steering in the last six months, riders with probationary licences were the most confident about performing sudden swerves in emergency situations

    usefulness of training - riders aged 35 and over most likely to use cornering skills learnt in training "always"

    This research was undertaken under contract to the Federal Office of Road Safety with financial support from VicRoads.

    FUENTE: Case-control study of motorcycle crashes - Monash University

    PDF CON EL ESTUDIO COMPLETO: http://www.monash.edu.au/miri/resear...ts/atsb174.pdf
    00CHARLIE le gusta esto.

  2. #2
    Avatar de aleib
    Fecha de ingreso
    16 nov, 11
    Ubicación
    Montevideo
    Edad
    33
    Mensajes
    785
    País
    Uruguay
    Moto
    Kawasaki C14

    Predeterminado

    esta muy bueno, aunque es yankee y del 1995, la situación del 2010-2011-2012 en uruguay es completamente diferente...
    Alguien tiene las estadísticas de acá? tiro al azar, pero creo que acá palmaba uno por día o cada dos días en promedio...
    Y la gran mayoría creo que es en las rutas (la 5 es tremenda, no se cuantos mueren por año ahí) y obviamente hablamos de motos/cascos/entrenamientos insuficientes para meterse en una ruta llena de camiones...
    Precios de Yamaha vs Kawasaki
    EEUU R1 13.990 < ZX10 14.999, Brasil R1 57.000 < ZX10 65.200,
    Argentina R1 27.430 < ZX10 29.900, Grecia R1 12.590 < ZX10 17.990,
    Chile R1 8.990.000 < ZX10 10.290.000, España R1 16.249 < ZX10 17.765,
    Inglaterra R1 11.999 < ZX10 12.999, Mexico R1 15.175 < ZX10 18.799,
    Colombia R1 39,990k < ZX10 42,000k, Canada R1 14.999 < ZX10 17.299,
    ....y mas...
    Pero en Uruguay, la R1 la venden a mayor precio que la ZX10... porque?

  3. #3
    Avatar de 00CHARLIE
    Fecha de ingreso
    21 may, 10
    Ubicación
    Ciudad de la Costa, Canelones, Uruguay
    Edad
    28
    Mensajes
    2,577
    País
    Uruguay
    Moto
    Honda "Hawk" CB400T
    Fotos
    19

    Predeterminado

    interesting...

    3 of the 5 motorcyclists not wearing helmets sustained head injuries
    facial injuries were uncommon and not significantly more common among those wearing open face helmets than full face helmets (8% versus 4%)
    spawn, Alexis y Oveja Negra les gusta esto.

  4. #4
    Avatar de aleib
    Fecha de ingreso
    16 nov, 11
    Ubicación
    Montevideo
    Edad
    33
    Mensajes
    785
    País
    Uruguay
    Moto
    Kawasaki C14

    Predeterminado

    capaz que es una idea de muy mal gusto.. y si alguien me manda a c@g@r esta en su derecho, pero:

    que les parece la idea de hacer un tipo un "obituario" en urumotos?, y hacer un thread, donde subamos los accidentes de motos que salen en los diarios? de esa forma podemos sacar nuestras propias estadisitica del foro...

    puede llegar a ser muy interesante, y si lo mantenemos entre todos, después podemos sacar bastante info, cuando pasando, en que lugares, edades, si usaban o no casco, etc, etc, etc.
    spawn, Alexis, 00CHARLIE y 2 mas les gusta esto.
    Precios de Yamaha vs Kawasaki
    EEUU R1 13.990 < ZX10 14.999, Brasil R1 57.000 < ZX10 65.200,
    Argentina R1 27.430 < ZX10 29.900, Grecia R1 12.590 < ZX10 17.990,
    Chile R1 8.990.000 < ZX10 10.290.000, España R1 16.249 < ZX10 17.765,
    Inglaterra R1 11.999 < ZX10 12.999, Mexico R1 15.175 < ZX10 18.799,
    Colombia R1 39,990k < ZX10 42,000k, Canada R1 14.999 < ZX10 17.299,
    ....y mas...
    Pero en Uruguay, la R1 la venden a mayor precio que la ZX10... porque?

  5. #5
    Avatar de 00CHARLIE
    Fecha de ingreso
    21 may, 10
    Ubicación
    Ciudad de la Costa, Canelones, Uruguay
    Edad
    28
    Mensajes
    2,577
    País
    Uruguay
    Moto
    Honda "Hawk" CB400T
    Fotos
    19

    Predeterminado

    Cita Iniciado por aleib Ver mensaje
    capaz que es una idea de muy mal gusto.. y si alguien me manda a c@g@r esta en su derecho, pero:

    que les parece la idea de hacer un tipo un "obituario" en urumotos?, y hacer un thread, donde subamos los accidentes de motos que salen en los diarios? de esa forma podemos sacar nuestras propias estadisitica del foro...

    puede llegar a ser muy interesante, y si lo mantenemos entre todos, después podemos sacar bastante info, cuando pasando, en que lugares, edades, si usaban o no casco, etc, etc, etc.
    Me gusta la idea!
    spawn le gusta esto.

  6. #6
    Avatar de aleib
    Fecha de ingreso
    16 nov, 11
    Ubicación
    Montevideo
    Edad
    33
    Mensajes
    785
    País
    Uruguay
    Moto
    Kawasaki C14

    Predeterminado

    le daría valor al foro no? digo, un foro de motos con su propia estadistica (aunque sea basada en el diario el país igual... algo es algo) de accidentes le da un valor agregado, es mas información, y eso se traduce en mas personas visitando, consultando y entrando al foro.

    propongo las relgas: 1) hacer un thread por año (arrancamos el 2012), 2) subir el accidente con una descripción y link (si existe), 3) leer antes a ver si alguien no lo subió primero :) 4) evitar/borrar el off-topic, asi queda limpio...
    Cuando queremos, hacemos una revisión mensual, trimestral o lo que sea, y ahí sacamos el reporte para otro thread...
    spawn, Alexis, 00CHARLIE y 2 mas les gusta esto.
    Precios de Yamaha vs Kawasaki
    EEUU R1 13.990 < ZX10 14.999, Brasil R1 57.000 < ZX10 65.200,
    Argentina R1 27.430 < ZX10 29.900, Grecia R1 12.590 < ZX10 17.990,
    Chile R1 8.990.000 < ZX10 10.290.000, España R1 16.249 < ZX10 17.765,
    Inglaterra R1 11.999 < ZX10 12.999, Mexico R1 15.175 < ZX10 18.799,
    Colombia R1 39,990k < ZX10 42,000k, Canada R1 14.999 < ZX10 17.299,
    ....y mas...
    Pero en Uruguay, la R1 la venden a mayor precio que la ZX10... porque?

  7. #7
    Administrador Avatar de spawn
    Fecha de ingreso
    29 oct, 09
    Ubicación
    Montevideo - Uruguay
    Edad
    29
    Mensajes
    3,605
    País
    Uruguay
    Moto
    Yamaha RD350 / Honda Kinetic
    Fotos
    1155

    Predeterminado

    Me parece excelente, podemos crear el tema aquí Seguridad Vial y usando la herramienta de Google tipo excel se va actualizando como tu bien dices.
    00CHARLIE le gusta esto.


  8. #8
    Avatar de aleib
    Fecha de ingreso
    16 nov, 11
    Ubicación
    Montevideo
    Edad
    33
    Mensajes
    785
    País
    Uruguay
    Moto
    Kawasaki C14

    Predeterminado

    y bueno dale, arrancamos 1ro enero 2012 les parece?
    O podemos comenzar ya, tipo prueba con lo que queda del 2011 y vamos viendo... lo feo es que los que salen en los diarios, por lo general son los que hay muertos...pero bueno, por otro lado es bueno recordar ese datos ante de subirse, uno anda mas despacito...
    spawn y Oveja Negra les gusta esto.
    Precios de Yamaha vs Kawasaki
    EEUU R1 13.990 < ZX10 14.999, Brasil R1 57.000 < ZX10 65.200,
    Argentina R1 27.430 < ZX10 29.900, Grecia R1 12.590 < ZX10 17.990,
    Chile R1 8.990.000 < ZX10 10.290.000, España R1 16.249 < ZX10 17.765,
    Inglaterra R1 11.999 < ZX10 12.999, Mexico R1 15.175 < ZX10 18.799,
    Colombia R1 39,990k < ZX10 42,000k, Canada R1 14.999 < ZX10 17.299,
    ....y mas...
    Pero en Uruguay, la R1 la venden a mayor precio que la ZX10... porque?

  9. #9
    Avatar de Guarf
    Fecha de ingreso
    02 nov, 09
    Edad
    31
    Mensajes
    6,211
    País
    Japan
    Moto
    ZX6R - EN125

    Predeterminado

    mmm la idea es buena, pero no se si la información que hay en los diarios puede ser útil.

    me acuerdo la "confusión" de un usuario que vió un accidente, sacó fotos, y luego afirmaba que el conductor no llevaba casco porque no lo vio junto a la moto... perfectamente puede ser una fruta, porque si el casco está golpeado lo mandan al hospital junto al paciente para que vean la zona del impacto.
    spawn le gusta esto.
    I don't race to break laws, I do it because I can.


  10. #10
    Administrador Avatar de spawn
    Fecha de ingreso
    29 oct, 09
    Ubicación
    Montevideo - Uruguay
    Edad
    29
    Mensajes
    3,605
    País
    Uruguay
    Moto
    Yamaha RD350 / Honda Kinetic
    Fotos
    1155

    Predeterminado

    Cita Iniciado por aleib Ver mensaje
    y bueno dale, arrancamos 1ro enero 2012 les parece?
    O podemos comenzar ya, tipo prueba con lo que queda del 2011 y vamos viendo... lo feo es que los que salen en los diarios, por lo general son los que hay muertos...pero bueno, por otro lado es bueno recordar ese datos ante de subirse, uno anda mas despacito...
    Hay que limitarse a la información de importancia sin herir a nadie. Ejemplo no poner nombres ni fotos.

    Solo poner lugar fecha nivel del siniestro y el por que por ejemplo. Yo voy a hablar con un conocido que es abogado y trabaja solo en caso de siniestros a ver si puede brindar algún dato. En su momento Customera estaba armando algo de eso y le había pedido las estadísticas a Caminera creo, habría que consultarle pero no se que fue de ella ...

 

 

Información de tema

Usuarios viendo este tema

Actualmente hay 1 usuarios viendo este tema. (0 miembros y 1 visitantes)

Temas similares

  1. Informe OMS sobre numero de accidentes
    Por thiagus18 en el foro Novedades
    Respuestas: 0
    Último mensaje: 10/05/2011, 20:29
  2. Test Buell XB12 S 50.000 Km en inglés
    Por josemabuell en el foro Multiproposito, Sport Tourer y Trail
    Respuestas: 6
    Último mensaje: 12/11/2010, 00:50
  3. Test Buell XB12 S 50.000 Km en inglés
    Por josemabuell en el foro Mecánica
    Respuestas: 0
    Último mensaje: 11/11/2010, 10:59
  4. Respuestas: 3
    Último mensaje: 28/01/2010, 14:05

Permisos de publicación

  • No puedes crear nuevos temas
  • No puedes responder temas
  • No puedes subir archivos adjuntos
  • No puedes editar tus mensajes
  •  

SEO by vBSEO